On the Today program this morning there was a gentleman who corrected John Humphries when he was introduced as a solicitor and asked instead to be called a litigation executive. I was flummoxed.
*waves* Hello!! Erm, well I'm a Litigation Executive for one thing.
Basically I can't call myself a Solicitor as only qualified solicitor's can, it's a criminal offence under the Solicitor's Act to impersonate one.
I'm nearly qualified as a Legal Executive (one of the various forms of lawyers out there), but the title "Trainee Legal Executive" is very misleading when I've been doing this job for over 8 years! As my area is Litigation, Litigation Executive is the title I have. It's actually meaningless, but better than the alternatives.
Though when I qualify I will be able to call myself a Legal Executive (which again currently would be illegal for me to do) which does actually mean something.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-16 02:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-16 02:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-16 03:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-16 03:46 am (UTC)Basically I can't call myself a Solicitor as only qualified solicitor's can, it's a criminal offence under the Solicitor's Act to impersonate one.
I'm nearly qualified as a Legal Executive (one of the various forms of lawyers out there), but the title "Trainee Legal Executive" is very misleading when I've been doing this job for over 8 years! As my area is Litigation, Litigation Executive is the title I have. It's actually meaningless, but better than the alternatives.
Though when I qualify I will be able to call myself a Legal Executive (which again currently would be illegal for me to do) which does actually mean something.
That help?
no subject
Date: 2004-11-16 04:10 am (UTC)But yes *points at alan* hes one!
no subject
Date: 2004-11-16 10:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-17 01:56 am (UTC)Thank you for enlightening me.